1 00:00:04,800 --> 00:00:09,740 Hello, I am Suhasini Vincent, Associate Professor of Legal English 2 00:00:09,940 --> 00:00:14,880 at the University of Panthéon Assas, and in this week's course we shall 3 00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:19,940 have a look at the working of the SCOTUS, the limits of federal 4 00:00:20,140 --> 00:00:22,740 jurisdiction and the reach of federal courts. 5 00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:28,600 Section 1 of Article 3 clearly states that the power to interpret 6 00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:32,400 the law of the United States would be held by the United States Supreme 7 00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:36,620 Court and the lower federal courts, even though today the U.S. 8 00:00:36,820 --> 00:00:41,180 has more than 100 federal courts, that is 94 district courts, 9 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:44,620 13 circuit courts and one Supreme Court. 10 00:00:45,100 --> 00:00:48,420 The Supreme Court is the only one that was created by the Constitution 11 00:00:48,620 --> 00:00:49,380 itself. 12 00:00:49,660 --> 00:00:52,780 It is thus the oldest federal court in the country. 13 00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:57,980 The Court is composed of nine justices, one Chief Justice and eight Associate 14 00:00:58,180 --> 00:00:59,020 Justices. 15 00:00:59,300 --> 00:01:04,260 The current Supreme Court is composed of the following justices as shown 16 00:01:04,460 --> 00:01:05,220 in the picture. 17 00:01:06,440 --> 00:01:11,280 Decisions handed down by the United States Supreme Court uphold the U.S. 18 00:01:11,780 --> 00:01:14,020 Constitution and determine how the U.S. 19 00:01:14,540 --> 00:01:18,580 Constitution and further federal legislation attempting to support 20 00:01:18,780 --> 00:01:19,540 the U.S. 21 00:01:19,740 --> 00:01:24,780 Constitution ought to be interpreted and applied across the United States. 22 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:29,940 So the United States Supreme Court possesses immense power to check 23 00:01:30,140 --> 00:01:34,720 and balance the federal legislative branch, the executive branch and 24 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:36,820 state laws that go against the U.S. 25 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:38,000 Constitution. 26 00:01:38,340 --> 00:01:43,380 The Constitution does not specify qualifications for justices such as age, 27 00:01:43,580 --> 00:01:46,480 education, profession or native-born citizenship. 28 00:01:47,440 --> 00:01:51,820 A justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, 29 00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:55,880 but all justices have been trained in the law and have been sitting 30 00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:58,660 judges at the time they are nominated by the U.S. 31 00:01:59,180 --> 00:01:59,940 President. 32 00:02:00,140 --> 00:02:04,920 During the Senate confirmations process, the Senate may consider 33 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:08,940 where nominees stand on issues which are contentious to the American 34 00:02:09,140 --> 00:02:09,900 public. 35 00:02:10,820 --> 00:02:14,860 The Supreme Court's nine justices are nominated by the U.S. 36 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:19,620 President and appointed for a life tenure after a confirmation by 37 00:02:19,820 --> 00:02:23,700 the Senate as stipulated in Article 2, Section 2. 38 00:02:24,100 --> 00:02:27,200 Today Chief Justice John Roberts presides over the court. 39 00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:32,540 The most recently appointed justices are Kate Tangee Brown Jackson and 40 00:02:32,740 --> 00:02:33,840 Amy Coney Barrett. 41 00:02:34,500 --> 00:02:36,720 Justice Brown fills the seat of Stephen Breyer. 42 00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:41,580 She was nominated by President Joe Biden and is the first black 43 00:02:41,780 --> 00:02:44,600 woman to serve on the United States Supreme Court. 44 00:02:45,220 --> 00:02:47,580 Justice Barrett filled the seat of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. 45 00:02:48,220 --> 00:02:52,860 She was nominated by the then sitting President Donald Trump and sworn 46 00:02:53,060 --> 00:02:57,140 in weeks after Ginsburg's passing, the shortest period in modern U.S. 47 00:02:57,340 --> 00:02:58,940 history for a new U.S. 48 00:02:59,180 --> 00:03:01,140 Supreme Court judge to take office. 49 00:03:02,260 --> 00:03:07,080 Petitions come with few exceptions from parties that lost cases in 50 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:10,740 Federal Courts of Epids, that is one of the 13 circuit courts, 51 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:16,260 or in the high state courts which may be referred to as a state Supreme 52 00:03:16,460 --> 00:03:17,220 Court. 53 00:03:17,420 --> 00:03:22,300 These may also be referred to in the literature as petitioners versus 54 00:03:22,500 --> 00:03:23,260 respondents. 55 00:03:24,100 --> 00:03:28,100 So petitioners who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court 56 00:03:28,300 --> 00:03:31,900 may petition the United States Supreme Court to hear their case. 57 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:36,900 They petition the court for review, asking it to grant a writ or 58 00:03:37,100 --> 00:03:37,860 sociaudary. 59 00:03:38,220 --> 00:03:42,800 This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send 60 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:45,000 up the record of the case for review. 61 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:49,900 The Supreme Court of the United States usually is not under any 62 00:03:50,100 --> 00:03:54,220 obligation to hear these cases and it usually only does so if 63 00:03:54,420 --> 00:03:59,680 the case could have significant significance might harmonize 64 00:03:59,880 --> 00:04:03,100 conflicting decisions in the Federal Circuit Courts. 65 00:04:03,300 --> 00:04:09,900 In fact the court accepts only 100 to 150 of the most important 66 00:04:10,100 --> 00:04:12,380 cases that it is asked to review each year. 67 00:04:13,060 --> 00:04:17,520 Typically the court hears cases that have been decided in either 68 00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:21,500 an appropriate United States Court of Appeals or the highest court 69 00:04:21,700 --> 00:04:22,460 in a given state. 70 00:04:23,100 --> 00:04:25,860 The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. 71 00:04:26,300 --> 00:04:30,900 According to these rules four of the nine justices must vote to 72 00:04:31,100 --> 00:04:31,860 accept a case. 73 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:37,720 When the justices have heard oral arguments and deliberated the majority 74 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:42,320 opinion explained in writing by one justice constitutes the United 75 00:04:42,520 --> 00:04:43,840 States Supreme Court decision. 76 00:04:45,000 --> 00:04:49,600 This then serves as a precedent that must be followed by all lower 77 00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,300 courts within the jurisdiction of the United States, 78 00:04:52,900 --> 00:04:55,640 both federal laws and laws within the states. 79 00:04:56,220 --> 00:05:00,160 That being in place the United States Supreme Court itself may 80 00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:03,760 change rules established by its own earlier decisions. 81 00:05:04,500 --> 00:05:09,400 Supreme Court justices are regularly described with labels as conservative, 82 00:05:09,780 --> 00:05:15,200 moderate or liberal according to their apparent judicial or political 83 00:05:15,400 --> 00:05:16,160 philosophy. 84 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:20,640 Justices do not always vote in the direction of their political 85 00:05:20,840 --> 00:05:25,260 stance but over time United States Supreme Court nominations and 86 00:05:25,460 --> 00:05:30,000 appointments have created polarized debates both politically and with 87 00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:30,960 the general public. 88 00:05:31,900 --> 00:05:36,500 Justices in favor of judicial restraint feel that laws should be interpreted 89 00:05:36,700 --> 00:05:42,360 in particular the strictly avoiding new pronouncements that seem to 90 00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:46,080 change an existing interpretation of the law deferring to federal 91 00:05:46,280 --> 00:05:49,520 or state legislatures on controversial issues. 92 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:53,700 They believe that it is essential to interpret the constitution and 93 00:05:53,900 --> 00:05:58,300 laws keeping in mind the intentions of the founding fathers at the 94 00:05:58,500 --> 00:05:59,440 time of its adoption. 95 00:06:00,220 --> 00:06:03,800 They adhere to a conservative way of interpreting the constitution. 96 00:06:04,540 --> 00:06:09,580 In contrast others defend the idea of a living constitution the 97 00:06:09,780 --> 00:06:12,980 interpretation of which is a belief that the United States Supreme 98 00:06:13,180 --> 00:06:16,660 Court should evolve to reflect changes in society. 99 00:06:17,260 --> 00:06:22,080 They defend the lawmaking role of this judiciary in a common law 100 00:06:22,280 --> 00:06:23,040 tradition. 101 00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:27,860 Critics of this approach accuse them of judicial activism or 102 00:06:28,060 --> 00:06:32,520 legislating from the bench as they interpret the laws and constitution 103 00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:37,160 by adapting and following the evolutions of society that are 104 00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:40,620 liberal and progressive in the interpretations of the law. 105 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:44,440 The limited jurisdiction of federal courts. 106 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:50,840 Section 2 defines the jurisdiction of the judicial power of the federal 107 00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:51,800 courts. 108 00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:55,680 Jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear a case. 109 00:06:56,160 --> 00:07:00,640 So this section tells us what kinds of cases the supreme court and 110 00:07:00,840 --> 00:07:02,180 other federal courts will hear. 111 00:07:02,940 --> 00:07:07,160 These powers are limited and keep in mind that the last majority 112 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:12,400 of criminal civil and family law cases are heard in state not federal 113 00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:13,360 courts. 114 00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:19,380 More than 100 million cases are filed every year in the US state 115 00:07:19,580 --> 00:07:25,020 trial courts while roughly only 400,000 cases are filed in federal 116 00:07:25,220 --> 00:07:25,980 trial courts. 117 00:07:26,420 --> 00:07:31,580 These are approximately 30,000 state judges often elected or appointed 118 00:07:31,780 --> 00:07:36,080 for a fixed period compared to 1,700 federal judges. 119 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:39,640 Let's look at the list of cases that may come up to this court. 120 00:07:40,460 --> 00:07:45,140 All cases that arise under the constitution, the laws of the United 121 00:07:45,340 --> 00:07:48,940 States or its treaties, all cases that affect American 122 00:07:49,140 --> 00:07:54,420 ambassadors, public officials and public councils, all cases of admiralty 123 00:07:54,620 --> 00:07:58,700 and maritime jurisdiction, cases that involve national voters, 124 00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:03,180 all cases in which the United States is a party when a state, 125 00:08:03,380 --> 00:08:07,040 a citizen or a foreign power sues the national government, 126 00:08:07,540 --> 00:08:12,460 all cases that involve one or more states or the citizens of different 127 00:08:12,660 --> 00:08:17,640 states, all cases between citizens of the same state who are claiming 128 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:20,040 land under grants from other states. 129 00:08:20,680 --> 00:08:24,920 A federal court's limited jurisdiction thus means that they can only hear 130 00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:30,180 federal judicial conflicts known as cases and controversies which 131 00:08:30,380 --> 00:08:33,920 from the start are supposed to exclude advisory opinions, 132 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:36,140 theoretical and political questions. 133 00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:41,720 To be heard in federal court, a case must fall under one of two 134 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:44,120 broad categories of subject matter jurisdiction. 135 00:08:44,860 --> 00:08:49,260 Firstly, federal questions and next, diversity of citizenship. 136 00:08:50,220 --> 00:08:55,680 Federal questions cover, I quote, all cases in law and equity 137 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:59,800 arising under the constitution and the laws of the United States, 138 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:00,760 close quotes. 139 00:09:01,180 --> 00:09:06,180 These are lawsuits in which plaintiffs are able to base their claims on 140 00:09:06,380 --> 00:09:09,900 federal law, that is Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution. 141 00:09:10,620 --> 00:09:14,460 Over time, this has been interpreted broadly by the United States Supreme 142 00:09:14,660 --> 00:09:18,420 Court, allowing federal courts to hear any case where there is 143 00:09:18,620 --> 00:09:19,580 a federal ingredient. 144 00:09:20,100 --> 00:09:24,580 This means that federal courts will hear cases that involve issues 145 00:09:24,780 --> 00:09:28,080 touching on the Constitution or other federal laws. 146 00:09:28,680 --> 00:09:32,460 The source of federal question jurisdiction can be found in the 147 00:09:32,660 --> 00:09:33,420 Constitution. 148 00:09:33,860 --> 00:09:37,400 Here are some examples of federal question jurisdiction. 149 00:09:37,920 --> 00:09:42,440 For instance, a retired woman brings an action against the government 150 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:47,480 to obtain federal social security or pension benefits that were denied 151 00:09:47,680 --> 00:09:48,440 to her. 152 00:09:48,660 --> 00:09:53,140 A man may sue the company that fired him in violation of federal 153 00:09:53,340 --> 00:09:54,600 anti-discrimination laws. 154 00:09:55,280 --> 00:10:00,320 Or one smartphone manufacturer files a money claim against a 155 00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:02,520 competitor for copying its product features. 156 00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:05,000 This is called patent infringement. 157 00:10:05,640 --> 00:10:09,560 A considerable amount of federal question litigation involves judicial 158 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:10,520 review. 159 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:14,860 In the context of an individual case, a court examines a government action 160 00:10:15,060 --> 00:10:19,120 that is legislative or executive, federal or state, to determine 161 00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:23,360 whether or not it falls under United States constitutional review, 162 00:10:23,660 --> 00:10:26,840 in other words, whether conforms to the U.S. 163 00:10:27,380 --> 00:10:28,140 Constitution. 164 00:10:28,420 --> 00:10:32,340 In the cases of diversity of citizenship cases, they cover, 165 00:10:32,540 --> 00:10:36,660 I quote, controversies between citizens of different states, 166 00:10:36,860 --> 00:10:37,620 close quotes. 167 00:10:38,060 --> 00:10:42,800 Federal law also authorizes federal courts to hear cases where the 168 00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:45,360 opposing parties are citizens of different states. 169 00:10:45,740 --> 00:10:50,520 This is known as diversity jurisdiction because the plaintiff and the defendant 170 00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:54,240 have different or diverse state citizenships. 171 00:10:54,580 --> 00:10:58,460 Diversity jurisdiction enables the federal court to hear cases 172 00:10:58,660 --> 00:11:00,280 where there's no federal question. 173 00:11:00,800 --> 00:11:05,680 In diversity cases, the federal court provides a fair forum where 174 00:11:05,880 --> 00:11:08,420 citizens of different states can have their cases heard. 175 00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:13,820 The federal law governing diversity jurisdiction states that in a case 176 00:11:14,020 --> 00:11:18,580 that must an amount in controversy, for example, 75,000 U.S. 177 00:11:19,300 --> 00:11:22,040 dollars or more before a federal court can hear a case. 178 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:26,080 Additionally, there are exceptions to diversity jurisdiction for some 179 00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:30,740 cases, including probate cases and family law cases, 180 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:33,800 which are almost always handled in state courts. 181 00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:35,280 Here are some examples. 182 00:11:35,980 --> 00:11:40,700 For instance, a patient from New Jersey sues a New York doctor for 183 00:11:40,900 --> 00:11:45,360 malpractice after a disastrous operation, or a company with 184 00:11:45,560 --> 00:11:49,280 headquarters in Nevada that brings an action against its supplier 185 00:11:49,480 --> 00:11:52,940 based in California for providing defective merchandise. 186 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:58,860 Other types of cases listed in Section 2 similarly involve either 187 00:11:59,060 --> 00:12:01,720 federal interests or other forms of diversity. 188 00:12:02,300 --> 00:12:06,240 It's interesting to note that in Article 3, federal jurisdiction 189 00:12:06,440 --> 00:12:08,340 was not described as being exclusive. 190 00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:13,800 For many federal question cases and all diversity of citizenship cases, 191 00:12:14,440 --> 00:12:16,320 state courts will also share jurisdiction. 192 00:12:17,000 --> 00:12:20,560 As a result of these types of jurisdiction overlaps at times, 193 00:12:20,820 --> 00:12:24,800 over the years, Congress has established a number of rules to 194 00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:26,160 clarify these matters. 195 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:28,960 That is concurrent jurisdiction. 196 00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:33,860 It allows more than one court to have the authority to hear the 197 00:12:34,060 --> 00:12:34,920 same case. 198 00:12:35,180 --> 00:12:40,380 Section 2 also notes that the Supreme Court will have original jurisdiction 199 00:12:40,580 --> 00:12:45,440 in any case dealing with or affecting an ambassador, public minister 200 00:12:45,640 --> 00:12:48,700 or council or in which a state is a party. 201 00:12:49,440 --> 00:12:53,880 Original jurisdiction is the power of a court to hear a case first. 202 00:12:54,220 --> 00:12:58,320 That means that in any case dealing with these groups of public servants, 203 00:12:58,780 --> 00:13:03,340 the Supreme Court must hear the case first and no lower court can do so. 204 00:13:03,720 --> 00:13:07,520 In addition to these original jurisdiction cases, the Supreme 205 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:10,660 Court will have appellate jurisdiction in all other cases. 206 00:13:11,260 --> 00:13:16,000 Appellate jurisdiction is the power to hear a case after a lower court 207 00:13:16,200 --> 00:13:17,920 has already decided the case. 208 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,320 That is what it means to hear the case on appeal. 209 00:13:22,020 --> 00:13:25,640 You should remember that the Supreme Court is the only federal court 210 00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:28,920 to have both original and appellate jurisdiction. 211 00:13:29,740 --> 00:13:34,340 Thus Article 3 includes the distinction between original jurisdiction, 212 00:13:34,680 --> 00:13:40,460 that is cases heard at first instance at trials, and appellate jurisdiction 213 00:13:40,660 --> 00:13:43,580 when parties contest trial decisions. 214 00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:48,000 As inferior federal trial courts were soon to be created, 215 00:13:48,460 --> 00:13:52,100 the US Supreme Court was given original jurisdiction for only 216 00:13:52,300 --> 00:13:55,500 a few types of cases, as in Section 2. 217 00:13:56,120 --> 00:14:00,660 Congress has since, over time, empowered lower federal courts 218 00:14:00,860 --> 00:14:05,140 to try most federal cases, leaving US Supreme Court first 219 00:14:05,340 --> 00:14:08,640 instance jurisdiction mostly for conflicts between states, 220 00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:13,660 that is border disputes and what can broadly be referred to as civil 221 00:14:13,860 --> 00:14:17,780 rights, questions that they choose to hear which are seen to be protected 222 00:14:17,980 --> 00:14:19,220 under the US Constitution. 223 00:14:20,040 --> 00:14:23,920 With this we complete our program for semester one and let me wish 224 00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:25,640 you all the best for your exams. 225 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:26,680 Thank you.