1 00:00:05,300 --> 00:00:08,620 Good morning, this is part two of our study of federalism. 2 00:00:08,920 --> 00:00:13,240 Today, we are going to analyse why States are called ""laboratories 3 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:17,560 of democracy" and "markets of laws" and then we will briefly study 4 00:00:17,760 --> 00:00:20,540 Articles IV and VI of the US Constitution. 5 00:00:21,800 --> 00:00:24,640 We have seen that, under the US Constitution, Congress has been 6 00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:28,180 granted the power to regulate commerce among the States which is called 7 00:00:28,380 --> 00:00:29,340 interstate commerce. 8 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:33,740 However, regulating commerce is a power that also belongs to the 9 00:00:33,940 --> 00:00:35,440 States at state level. 10 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:39,140 Each State has the power to regulate commerce within its own boundaries 11 00:00:39,340 --> 00:00:41,160 more or less as it wishes. 12 00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:46,140 This creates differences as States compete with one another to attract 13 00:00:46,340 --> 00:00:48,820 companies or people and pass laws to do so. 14 00:00:49,500 --> 00:00:51,980 That is why States have been called "markets of laws". 15 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:56,680 You have all heard of Delaware's legislation which is hugely favorable 16 00:00:56,880 --> 00:00:59,720 to companies to the point of being called a tax haven. 17 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:07,660 As many as 285,000 businesses share the same address (1209 North Orange 18 00:01:07,860 --> 00:01:11,920 Street) even though for some that is almost the only link that they 19 00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:12,880 have with that State. 20 00:01:13,580 --> 00:01:16,960 They have chosen to be incorporated or registered there because it 21 00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:20,620 allows them to avoid the sales taxes and regulations imposing 22 00:01:20,820 --> 00:01:24,480 higher costs and more transparency that apply elsewhere. 23 00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:27,120 Foreign companies have been attracted too. 24 00:01:28,320 --> 00:01:32,160 Another less well-known but similar system is that of Texas which does 25 00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:36,480 not levy state income taxes on residents to attract people. 26 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:41,720 That strategy works as Texas is the second largest U.S. 27 00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:44,020 State in population after California. 28 00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:50,120 It had the highest population increase between 2000 and 2010 and is now 29 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:54,660 the fourth fastest growing State according to the last census of 2020. 30 00:01:55,500 --> 00:02:00,500 Concretely speaking, it added four million people between 2010 and 31 00:02:00,700 --> 00:02:04,960 2020 and now has a total of more than 29 million people. 32 00:02:05,620 --> 00:02:08,260 That has significant political consequences. 33 00:02:08,740 --> 00:02:13,400 Indeed, even though California remains the most popular State, because 34 00:02:13,600 --> 00:02:18,680 the growth of its population has slowed down, it will lose a U.S. 35 00:02:19,180 --> 00:02:21,500 Representative seat in the next election of 2024. 36 00:02:22,260 --> 00:02:26,780 Texas will gain two of them and is the only State to get more than 37 00:02:26,980 --> 00:02:29,100 one additional seat in the U.S. 38 00:02:29,300 --> 00:02:32,700 Congress which gives an idea of how fast its population is growing 39 00:02:32,900 --> 00:02:34,380 compared to other States. 40 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:39,240 Having two more Representatives of the State in the House is of 41 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:42,780 course a significant advantage especially in times when there 42 00:02:42,980 --> 00:02:44,180 is no clear majority. 43 00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:48,600 Indeed those two seats might make a huge difference and even decide 44 00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:51,900 the passing or not of a law at federal level. 45 00:02:52,620 --> 00:02:56,300 States are also called "laboratories of democracy" for the novel 46 00:02:56,500 --> 00:02:58,560 social experiments they carry out. 47 00:02:58,860 --> 00:03:02,840 An example would be the laws allowing use, consumption and sale of marijuana. 48 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:06,200 Massachusetts is another interesting example. 49 00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:10,520 Two instances of what it has done are same-sex marriage, which became 50 00:03:10,720 --> 00:03:15,840 legal in 2004, and affordable health insurance coverage to all residents, 51 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,700 which was implemented in 2006. 52 00:03:21,130 --> 00:03:25,230 As we have seen, from the very beginning, the aim of the drafters, 53 00:03:26,730 --> 00:03:31,730 admittedly mainly federalist ones, was to establish a system that 54 00:03:31,930 --> 00:03:36,010 would form a more perfect union, would reinforce the union of the 55 00:03:36,210 --> 00:03:40,050 States first by making it easier for StateS to settle their disputes 56 00:03:40,250 --> 00:03:43,450 and second by granting more power to the Federal Government. 57 00:03:44,070 --> 00:03:48,890 This was achieved by the ratification of respectively Article IV and Article 58 00:03:49,090 --> 00:03:49,850 VI of the U.S. 59 00:03:50,050 --> 00:03:50,810 Constitution. 60 00:03:51,010 --> 00:03:53,770 There are four sections in Article IV. 61 00:03:53,970 --> 00:03:56,270 The first two are the most famous ones. 62 00:03:56,550 --> 00:03:59,710 Section 1 is called the Full Faith and Credit Clause because it imposes 63 00:03:59,910 --> 00:04:03,770 on the States to give faith and credit to "public acts, 64 00:04:04,010 --> 00:04:08,230 records and judicial proceedings of every other State". 65 00:04:08,890 --> 00:04:12,810 For example, birth and marriage certificates are issued at state 66 00:04:13,010 --> 00:04:17,350 level and when a State issues one it is valid in all the other States. 67 00:04:18,050 --> 00:04:21,530 This is seldom a problem but it can be, as was shown by the controversy 68 00:04:21,730 --> 00:04:25,510 on same-sex marriage between 2004, when Massachusetts passed a law 69 00:04:25,710 --> 00:04:27,650 allowing it, and the decision of the U.S. 70 00:04:27,850 --> 00:04:30,570 Supreme Court, which imposed it upon all the States in the case 71 00:04:30,770 --> 00:04:33,310 Obergefell and Hodges in 2015. 72 00:04:34,330 --> 00:04:37,930 During that period, the question was: should a state which has not 73 00:04:38,130 --> 00:04:42,530 passed the law providing for same-sex marriage, which does not want to do so, 74 00:04:42,790 --> 00:04:46,850 be forced to recognize a marriage certificate (and all the benefits 75 00:04:47,050 --> 00:04:51,730 that are derived from marital status) of two same-sex people who were 76 00:04:51,930 --> 00:04:52,970 married in another State? 77 00:04:53,450 --> 00:04:56,650 Or could that marriage certificate be considered to be invalid in 78 00:04:56,850 --> 00:04:57,610 that State? 79 00:04:59,010 --> 00:05:01,870 Similarly, if someone has been sentenced to prison in a State 80 00:05:02,070 --> 00:05:05,650 that person cannot escape that sentence by fleeing to another State. 81 00:05:05,850 --> 00:05:09,670 They will be sent back to the State which found them guilty by any 82 00:05:09,870 --> 00:05:13,870 State where they try to find refuge even if it is to face the death 83 00:05:14,070 --> 00:05:17,830 penalty and the State where the refugee fled is against it. 84 00:05:18,350 --> 00:05:21,810 It is also possible at trial for a party to ask the Court to deliver 85 00:05:22,010 --> 00:05:25,410 a decision that is similar to one that has already been handed down 86 00:05:25,610 --> 00:05:26,650 in another State. 87 00:05:27,610 --> 00:05:31,830 However in that case the Court is free to accept or to refuse to do so. 88 00:05:32,370 --> 00:05:36,610 So be careful here: giving full faith and credit does not always 89 00:05:36,810 --> 00:05:40,390 mean strictly applying decisions made in other States. 90 00:05:40,930 --> 00:05:45,270 States retain their own power to decide, especially as far as courts are concerned, 91 00:05:45,470 --> 00:05:48,970 when it has not been decided in the Constitution that they should 92 00:05:49,170 --> 00:05:50,670 not have any leeway. 93 00:05:52,310 --> 00:05:55,290 Section two of Article IV is called the Privileges and Immunities 94 00:05:55,490 --> 00:05:58,150 Clause because it protects the privileges and immunities of each 95 00:05:58,350 --> 00:06:01,570 citizen when they travel to or through different States where they 96 00:06:01,770 --> 00:06:03,270 do not reside. 97 00:06:03,610 --> 00:06:06,710 Privileges refers to rights and immunities to legal protection. 98 00:06:07,230 --> 00:06:11,130 It is also possible to say that privileges refers to positive rights, 99 00:06:11,330 --> 00:06:14,970 the right to vote for example, while immunities are negative rights, 100 00:06:15,170 --> 00:06:18,590 that is, the right not to... for example, the right not to be deported to 101 00:06:18,790 --> 00:06:19,590 a foreign country. 102 00:06:20,930 --> 00:06:25,430 In the case Corfield v Coryfel in 1823 Justice Bushwood 103 00:06:25,630 --> 00:06:29,670 Washington, who happened to be George Washington's nephew, made a list 104 00:06:29,870 --> 00:06:33,310 of the privileges and immunities enjoyed by American citizens under 105 00:06:33,510 --> 00:06:37,590 the US constitution, among which the right to be protected by the 106 00:06:37,790 --> 00:06:40,530 Government, the right to life, liberty and property, 107 00:06:41,030 --> 00:06:45,190 the right to travel to and settle in other States and the right to vote. 108 00:06:46,070 --> 00:06:49,030 Keep in mind that each citizen, being at the same time a citizen 109 00:06:49,230 --> 00:06:52,890 of the State where they reside and a citizen of the USA, can be 110 00:06:53,090 --> 00:06:57,010 granted more rights by their own State under the state constitution 111 00:06:57,210 --> 00:06:59,390 than those that are federally protected. 112 00:07:00,610 --> 00:07:05,250 Section three of Article IV describes how new States may be integrated 113 00:07:05,450 --> 00:07:08,610 into the Union, that is, only by Congress. 114 00:07:09,590 --> 00:07:13,590 It reads "The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make 115 00:07:13,790 --> 00:07:18,510 all necessary needful rules and regulations respecting the territory 116 00:07:18,710 --> 00:07:21,970 of other property belonging to the United States". 117 00:07:23,530 --> 00:07:27,230 Section four imposes a republican form of government. Nowadays, the 118 00:07:27,430 --> 00:07:30,970 words "republic" and "democracy" are often used indifferently but at 119 00:07:31,170 --> 00:07:35,190 the time the Constitution was ratified the Framers differentiated them. 120 00:07:35,390 --> 00:07:38,910 For them, democracy referred to a system of government in which 121 00:07:39,110 --> 00:07:43,290 the power of the majority is unlimited, be it exercised directly or through 122 00:07:43,490 --> 00:07:47,870 a representative body. In that system, the rule of the majority is absolute 123 00:07:48,070 --> 00:07:51,130 and it is perfectly possible for the majority to act in a tyrannical 124 00:07:51,330 --> 00:07:56,130 way towards a majority minority. In a republic, the rule of the majority 125 00:07:56,330 --> 00:08:00,710 also applies but minorities are protected thanks to a system of 126 00:08:00,910 --> 00:08:04,670 guarantee of individual rights and checks of the majority rule. 127 00:08:04,870 --> 00:08:09,030 A republican government limits the power of the majority to protect 128 00:08:09,230 --> 00:08:14,690 minorities: the majority rule applies but within defined and prescribed 129 00:08:14,890 --> 00:08:20,540 limits. Section two of Article VI, which is the only section that 130 00:08:20,740 --> 00:08:24,380 we will study, reads "This Constitution and the laws of the 131 00:08:24,580 --> 00:08:28,280 United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties 132 00:08:28,480 --> 00:08:32,040 made, or which shall be made under the authority of the United States 133 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:36,200 shall be the supreme law of the land". As a consequence, the U.S. 134 00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:39,840 Constitution is the supreme law of the land which means that any 135 00:08:40,040 --> 00:08:44,240 law, state or federal, which contradicts it will be struck down as 136 00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:48,020 unconstitutional and federal law is superior to state law in case 137 00:08:48,220 --> 00:08:52,220 there is a conflict between the two. Keep in mind that there are 138 00:08:52,420 --> 00:08:56,260 laws that are passed by the States and of which state courts will 139 00:08:56,460 --> 00:09:01,040 be the final interpreters, not federal courts. This means that if a federal 140 00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:04,040 court has to adjudicate a case which is based on a violation of 141 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:08,040 a state law as happens in diversity cases (which you will study in Unit 142 00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:13,340 six), its decision is not final and can be overturned 143 00:09:13,540 --> 00:09:17,740 by state courts. There are also situations in which a conflict 144 00:09:17,940 --> 00:09:21,780 between federal and state laws has not been settled yet and the 145 00:09:21,980 --> 00:09:26,020 two contradictory laws co-exist. That is the case in States in which 146 00:09:26,220 --> 00:09:29,220 marijuana is allowed whereas it is still forbidden at the federal 147 00:09:29,420 --> 00:09:34,300 level. In that sort of cases, the federal prosecutors usually do 148 00:09:34,500 --> 00:09:37,520 not prosecute those who possess or sell that drug unless that is 149 00:09:37,720 --> 00:09:40,560 the good excuse they were looking for to prosecute that offender 150 00:09:40,760 --> 00:09:43,660 who they suspect has committed other crimes forbidden at federal 151 00:09:43,860 --> 00:09:45,780 level. That's the end of today's lesson.